Public Law 102-14
states emphatically that all
civilization from the
beginning has been based upon a set of laws entitled "The Seven noahide
Laws". I bet you did not know this, did you? You probably believed that
the Holy Bible was
the basis upon which civilization was based. What are "The Seven
noahide Laws" and from whence did they come? These seven supposed
universal laws, according to the Encyclopedia Americana, p. 737, state
that they are "a Jew_ish tal_mudic designation for seven biblical laws
given to Adam and to Noah before the
revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently, binding upon all
mankind." Don Bell correctly reports that these laws originated from the
mystic (and Satanic) Babylonian tal_mud, which no Christian has ever
accepted as inspired sacred Scripture. In fact,
the tal_mud is that collection of man-made interpretations of the
Pentateuch (Genesis through Deuteronomy) against which Jesus railed so
intensely. The tal_mud was taught as being equal with God's inspired
Word, even though the practical effect of its teachings were so often
the exact opposite of what God had intended.
However,
the Encyclopedia Americana continues its explanation of the noahide
Laws, "Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the noahide Laws as a
link between Jud_aism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical
conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of
fundamental human rights for all." This explanation leaves one to
believe that both Jews and Gentiles are bound by these seven laws;
however, Don Bell reports from Jewish sources that the Jew who lives
according to the torah is exempt from these seven laws. In other words,
these seven noahide Laws were
meant for
the Gentiles only!! They are meant to be a substitute for the Ten
Commandments. At this point, we need to briefly list these seven noahide
Laws.
The penalty for violating any of these noahide Laws is spelled out on page
1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica, "... violation of any one of the seven laws
subjects the noahide to capital punishment by decapitation." Wow, in other
words, if one person steps forward to accuse a Gentile of violating any one of
these seven laws, that testimony alone would be enough to decapitate the
accused. A person could be put to death for the flimsy accusation of being cruel
to animals, and based on the lying testimony of one person!! Notice, there is no
assumption of innocence until proven guilty, nor of the prosecution having to
prove their case. No, on the accusation of one person, the accused may be
legally decapitated.
Now
that I have your attention, let us examine further Public Law 102-14,
which set the noahide Laws as the basis for International Law, (read
United
Nations) to which all American law must conform. This public law singles
out one
Jewish group for special honor, saying that they embody the principles
of these noahide Laws. This group is the ultra-orthodox lubavitch
Movement, known for its
strict adherence to the smallest detail of the tal_mud. This group
believes their
head rabbi, menachem scheerson, is the prophesied Messiah, and are
anxiously
waiting for him to publicly proclaim his office. This is such a small
splinter
religious group that very few Americans have ever heard of it; yet, the
Congress
and the President of the United States have declared in this law that
this rabbi
is "universally respected and revered" and that his lubavitch movement
has
"fostered and promoted these seven noahide Laws". Don Bell again sheds
much
light upon this lubavitch Movement, when he quotes rabbi Louis
Finkelstein, the
head of the Jew_ish Theological Seminary of America in 1943, writing in
the
Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "pharisaism became tal_mudism...the
spirit of the
ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew studies the tal_mud,
he is
actually repeating arguments used in the palestinian academies." In
other words,
the tal_mudic lubavitchers are reborn Pharisees. Our listeners should
immediately
be alerted by this revelation, because, on July 17, 1993, we studied the
beliefs
of the Pharisees and discovered that they were occutlic. Many pharisees
belonged
to the Jew_ish occult group, the Cabal, Satanic through and through. We
studied
that the Jewish Cabal forms a most important foundational building block
upon
which the entire New World Order movement is based. Finally, we showed
how these
Ppharisees could hate Jesus Christ so vehemently, even in the face of
His
tremendous miracles. We understood how Jesus possessed such hatred of
the
teachings and the hypocrisy of the pharisees. Once we understand that
the pharisee of Jesus' day was involved in a Satanic secret society, we
can
understand how they could hate him so much.
The Pharisees also succeeded in killing Jesus Christ on the basis that He
blasphemed God, which is noahide Law # 2. Remember Jesus' words, in Matthew
10:24-25, that the disciples of the Master will be treated in just the same way
as the Master has been treated. I wonder if this Scripture has any
bearing upon
this current situation? Public Law 102-14 sets the foundation for
American and
United Nations Law to be established in such a way as to uphold these
Seven noahide Laws. These seven laws are a counterfeit of the Ten
Commandments, and
are promoted by the Neo-pharisee occult group, the lubavitchers. Don
Bell
further states that the lubavitchers are a "Mystic" group, thus
signifying that
they teach the Cabal as well as the tal_mud. This revelation ties them
directly
into the secret societies of today which are powering the drive into the
New
World Order, i.e., the Illuminati, the Freemasons, and the Bilderberger
Group,
just to name a few. Thus, it would seem natural that these secret
societies
would look favorably upon a Mystic Jew+ish group, which has its active
roots in
the ancient Cabal, a group which is a soul-mate to today's secret
societies.
The tal-mudic Choose and their remake of Sofiet Mass Murder here on "Marakan" apostate soil, you were warned to root these
Vipers out, but you refused
These
Hasidic tal_muidic so called "Chosen Vipers" have set up their Der
Homelandt Saykurity by their Purim Mordechain Chertoff the Son of Satan,
soon and very soon they will begin the purging of the True Christ
believers who will stand fast for their testimony of Jesus and their
witness against the so called god of tal_mudic Jewry and their
manufactured by the dragon, anti-Christ Noahide Laws, and their
Proselyte Telly Tubby tal_mudic Judeo Churchinsanity will help them
deliver Jesus's saints to death. These Hasidic pedophile Vipers, the
Pharisees of Sanhedrin and their puppets in Washington blatantly
overthrow America while you all sleep.....in ah ha the name ah ha
Judeo-Jaysoose...... But rejoice, for these Vipers are defeated at the
foundation of the World and sealed
at Calvary, and the saints of Jesus shall have everlasting life.
<cite id="yiv287585017yui_3_2_0_20_134542017081896">Once you grasp the implications, understand why
the WTC destruction and the ram-rodding in of the Patriot Act and the WARS which
has anihilated millions.</cite>
<cite>And why trillions of Dollars both US and foreign
are being robbed from the Humans of the earth and now being transferred to
Israel, for their coming false Utopia.</cite>
<cite id="yiv287585017yui_3_2_0_16_1345312848863105">Understand it is possible what the Mystery
Babylon, tal_mud Bavli (Babylon tal_mud) their books of filth and perversion says
about the penalty of believing that Jesus Christ is Deity, GOD Almighty..... who
in the Book of John "Refused to walk in Jewry, for the Jews sought to kill
him".</cite>
<cite>"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for
he would not walk in jewry, because the jews sought to kill him."</cite>
<cite>Then see this filth, the so called "Holy Books of
the Jews". which are not the WORD of GOD, but their oral traditition which makes
the WORD of GOD of none effect....Keeping in mind that Jesus warned to call no
man "Rabbi"</cite>
<cite id="yiv287585017yui_3_2_0_16_1345312848863121">
Babylonian tal_mud: Tractate Sanhedrin
Racism in Israel
The world is baffled why, in Israel today, the once persecuted Jews have
become persecutors. Highly educated religious Jews, especially in the
government and among the ultra Orthodox West Bank settlers, now treat
the Palestinians much worse than they would treat any animal.
In his film, "Gaza Strip," veteran filmmaker James Longley graphically
documents how the Israeli military shoots Arab children through the head
for the crime of throwing stones. While filming, Israeli helicopters
dropped canisters of debilitating nerve gas on the inhabitants of Gaza.
Like the Soviets once did in Afghanistan, Israeli troops left
booby-trapped toys on the ground in order to blow up curious children.
The explanation for such behavior is found in the tal_mud. The tal_mud
teaches the superiority and divine right of Jews over Gentiles: the Jew
is holy because of God’s racial covenant with Israel. According to the
tal_mud, Gentiles are unclean because, unlike Jews, they were not
present at Mt. Sinai. By standing on the mount, the Jews were
perpetually cleansed from lustful thoughts.
In its article on “Gentile,” the authoritative Jewish Encyclopedia
summarizes the tal_mud’s view of Jewish moral superiority. “The tal_mud
comments on the untruthfulness of Gentiles ... and contrasts it with the
reputation of a Jew: ‘The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity nor
speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth.
“The tal_mudic writers,” this article continues, “say that ‘ ... only
Israelites are men’ ... Gentiles they classed not as men but as
barbarians. Rabbi Johanan ben Zakki says that if anyone teaches the
tal_mud to a Gentile, “such a person deserves death. Judah ben Illai
recommends the daily recital of the benediction: “Blessed be thou ...
who has not made me a goi [or Gentile]. Jews are so holy, the tal_mud
says, “he who smites an Israelite on the cheek is as though he has thus
assaulted the divine presence of God.
Coming Jewish 'Utopia'
Ruled By Noahide Laws
By Rev. Ted Pike
5-30-7
Most of the world's great religions teach that their own way will
prevail in the end. Muslims believe the whole world will someday accept
their one God, Allah, and Mohammed as his prophet. Most Christians
believe that in a coming "millennium" Christ will firmly yet
benevolently rule a restored and enlightened world. Religious Jews also
await their future triumph, promised by the tal_mud. They keenly
anticipate the messiah they believe will exalt the Jewish people and
Hebraic monotheism to dominate the nations.
The Encyclopedia Judaica says hope in the coming Jewish messiah is
intense, especially among Orthodox Jews in Israel: "Orthodoxy retains
unimpaired the traditional doctrine Among Orthodox rabbis, there is no
lack of speculation on the meaning of contemporary events in light of
the messianic hope." ("Messiah," p. 1416)
In this ideal Jewish world, what happens to the rest of us? What is the
status of Gentiles, especially Christians? The Babylonian tal_mud, the
highest ethical and religious guide for observant Jews, says Gentiles
can join Judaism as proselytes today or in the future messianic kingdom,
as long as they sincerely follow seven commandments. These "Noahide
laws," says the tal_mud, form the basic moral code God gave Adam; they
prohibit idolatry, blasphemy, murder, theft, "illicit relations," eating
meat with blood, and "failing to establish courts of justice."
Medieval Jewish authority Maimonides, whose work remains highly
influential, wrote in his 12th century work the Mishneh Torah that
Gentiles should be compelled by Jews to practice Noahide law. In a
recent article for the Jewish Press, America's largest independent
Jewish weekly, Rabbi Moshe Ben-Chaim says Gentiles can be improved just
like Jews, but only through
conversion.
"The
Noachide laws," writes the rabbi, "are the bare essentials that entitle
a human being to retain his right to life." Remember he
is speaking
of Gentiles as well as Jews and, yes, he said right to life. Ben-Chaim
cites Isaiah's prophecy that someday Gentiles will flock to Jerusalem to
"learn Torah." Jews must encourage this mass conversion, he says, by
refusing to voice acceptance for other religions. "No, that deludes
gentiles into believing we view their religions on par with Torah," the
rabbi writes. "Judaism views all other religions as imposters, since no
other religion was God-given Again, God said, "One Torahfor yourselves,
and the convert." This means no other laws are acceptable, for any
people."
In this rabbi's words we find
contemporary mainstream affirmation, in one of
American Jewry's biggest publications, that deviance from Noahide law
cannot be morally tolerated by observant Jews. Ultimately, if things
were as they should be, Gentiles should be forced to comply.
With increase of the power and influence of judaism including its ultra-Orthodox branches, it is not surprising that jud_aism
recommends
the seven Noahide precepts as international law. In a discussion with
other religious leaders and President George Bush Sr., Rabbi Yakov Cohen
said the road map to world peace is found in the seven Noahide Laws.
Worldwide
Noahide observance was promoted by prominent Hasidic Rabbi Menachem
Schneerson. The late rabbi was the seventh leader of the widespread
Lubavitcher movement. Viewed as clannish and eccentric
in dress, the Lubavitchers are nevertheless very powerful and
well-funded, with enormous influence on the burgeoning ultra-Orthodox
movement in Israel. Before his death in 1994, Schneerson was the
reigning "temporary Messiah," or "Tzaddik," to a large segment of
Kabalist ultra-orthodox Jewry. He said global observance of Noahide law
would bring world peace and messianic redemption.
Schneerson
and his movement are so powerful that they persuaded Bush Sr. to
proclaim Education Day USA in which Schneerson is honored and Noahide
law upheld as an exalted code of ethics to inspire and guide mankind.
Schneerson trained thousands of rabbis to spread strict Jewish
observance (centering around the "Zohar" or mystical/revolutionary
Kabala) around the world.
"Influencing non-Jews to keep their
mitzvos, the Seven Noahide Laws... will assist our task of making the
world into a dwelling place for God, and help bring about the arrival of
Messiah," Schneerson said in 1987. He said, "Every Jew has the
obligation to ensure that all the peoples of the world observe the Seven
Noahide LawsThe religious tolerance of today, and the trend towards
greater freedom, gives us the unique opportunity to enhance widespread
observance of these laws."
Michael Kress, in an article for the
Noahide.org thinktank, approvingly describes a growing number of
Noahide-observant ex-Christians who reject the gospels' account of Jesus
and center their lives around the Seven Laws. In 1991, Yeshiva
University's law school hosted a symposium of Noahide scholars. Their
press release notes, "In previous generations, the precarious or
outright hostile conditions in which world Jewry survived precluded any
public discussion of the Code [presumably because host nations were not
at all pleased to hear about Jewish plans for worldwide legal control].
The
initial draft of the declaration, contained in a letter sent by
Rothschild to Balfour, referred to the principle "that Palestine
should
be reconstituted as the National Home of the Jewish people. In the
final text, the word that was replaced with in to avoid committing the
entirety of Palestine to this purpose. Similarly, an early draft did not
include the commitment that nothing should be done which might
prejudice the rights of the non-Jewish communities. These changes came
about partly as the result of the urgings of Edwin Samuel Montagu, an
influential anti-Zionist Jew and secretary of state for India, who was
concerned that the declaration without those changes could result in
increased anti-Semitic persecution. The draft was circulated and during
October the government
received replies from various
representatives of the Jewish community. Lord Rothschild took exception
to the new proviso on the basis that it presupposed the possibility of a
danger to non-Zionists, which he denied.
Authorship...
of course he did, wonder why?
</cite>
Would
worldwide coerced observance of the noahide laws create more religious
freedom and tolerance? Not a chance. The first law is against idolatry,
and what's idolatry? The babylonian tal_mud repeatedly says worship of
the false prophet Jesus Christ is idolatry, a crime worthy of death. The
tal_mud also says Christ was a blasphemer, a violator of the second
noahide precept. This makes His worshippers, who claim He's the second
member of a three-party trinity, blasphemers also. 1
America you had better waken today. Let not one more day
pass you by without preparation. The tal_mudic Hasidic Pharisees have
your
country in their tal_mudic anti-Christ grip, they seek to annihilate as
many "Goyim Christ" believers as possible in a very short time, to
usher in their Son of Perdition, false Christ. Root these Chabad
Bas_turd Vipers out of your midst. Root all of their Evangelical
anti-Christ warmongers and their Freemason proselytes out before it is
too late. Vote them out, run them out, cleanse this nation and bow to
the Creator God the Lamb of the Living, Jesus Christ and pray to restore
this nation to God. These Mafia mass murderers are inflicting
destruction to your homes and families and will not stop until your
children are DEAD DEAD DEAD...Just as did these Bolshevik Vipers of Hell
sent from Chew YORK, sent from the Hassidim tal_mudic Choose did, in
Russia in 1917.....what will you do? Stand Fast in the name of Jesus. Do
not be deceived at the Judaizers and their lies, for the
bread is now full of the leaven of the Pharisees, get out of that great
Harlot of Babylon, for these who they say are "chosen" are chosen for
eternal damnation, for when the chooser came, they cried out "Crucify
him" and let his blood be on our hands, and surely these who chose the
ROBBER who is the murderer from the beginning, do the lust of their
father that Murdering ROBBER. Root them all out now, every treasonous
blasphemous murderer, all of Congress, all of the jewdicial all of the
executive and every Freemason Judge, prosecutor, lawyer, police officer,
military who boast of their freemason god wannabe who is Lucifer as per
Albert Pike their grandaddy Mason unto that Sin-A-GOG of
Satan.......................If you are a freemason, note this, your time
is growing very short, where will you hide...Nohide, where will you
hide on that day of the Lords wrath and that day when your master is
cast into the lake of fire? If you are a anti-Christ jew, where
will you hide on that day? If you are an anti-Christ evangelical two
fold children of hell proselyte of these Pharisees, where will you and
your teletubby tal_mudic preachers hide on that Day? Where will you
zionist anti-Christ hide on that day? Just answer me.....
"It is our duty to
force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they
will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6,
2004)
In its article on “Gentile,” the authoritative Jewish Encyclopedia
summarizes the tal_mud’s view of Jewish moral superiority. “The T
tal_mud
comments on the
untruthfulness
of Gentiles ... and contrasts it with the reputation of a Jew: ‘The
remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity nor speak lies; neither shall a
deceitful tongue be found in their mouth. “The tal_mudic writers,” this
article continues, “say that ‘ ... only Israelites are men’ ... Gentiles
they classed not as men but as barbarians. Rabbi Johanan ben Zakki says
that if anyone teaches the tal_mud to a Gentile, “such a person
deserves death. Judah ben Illai recommends the daily recital of the
benediction: “Blessed be thou ... who has not made me a goi [or
Gentile]. Jews are so holy, the tal_mud says, “he who smites an jew on
the cheek is as though he has thus assaulted the divine presence, and
slapped God him self.
Both tal_mud and Zohar proclaim the Jewish people to be semi-divine and occupy a position even above angels. "He who
smites
an jew on the jaw is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine
Presence, for it is written, One who smiteth man ( i.e., an jew)
attacketh the Holy One." (Sanhedrin 58b) Already, through ADL hate laws
in countries like Canada and Britain, Judaism and rabbinic literature
cannot be verbally "assaulted" through criticism. Such "anti-Semitism"
is punished severely as a hate crime. ADL's U.S. State Department
"Office of Global Anti-Semitism" defines "anti-Semitism" as "strong
criticism of Israel's leaders." Suggesting a Jewish conspiracy or even
repeating the New Testament allegation that the Jews had Christ
crucified are among 14 offenses considered anti-Semitic.The Real Motive
Behind the 'Department of Global Anti-Semitism' ) the noahide
enforcement .
When Christ accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of.
Second
century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis
and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned
pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than
three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years
and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1 Subsequent rabbis refer to
ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as "halakah," or binding Jewish
law. 2 Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews?
Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of
thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days
and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.
References to
pedophilia abound in the tal_mud. They occupy considerable sections of
Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by
the tal_mud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.
The
rabbit ribeye rabbis of the tal_mud are notorious for their legal
hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement
about their
right to molest three year
old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of
dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear
passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well!
It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences
debate.
Because the tal_mudic authorities who sanction
pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so
explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition
of the tal_mud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest
criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far
earlier age than now 3 years old.
In fact, footnote 5 to
Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a tal_mudic rabbi to disagree with
ben Yohai's endorsement of pedophilia: "How could they [the rabbit
ribeye rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which
has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young
proselyte?"
These laws are precedents which can be joined with Noahide law and enforced from Jerusalem, to make it a capital offense in the
new
Jewish world order to "blaspheme" the "holy people" by criticism. Just
this year, Knesset members tried to get Jewish Italian scholar Prof.
Ariel Toaff indicted in Israel for his book that said there was truth to
the 15th century "blood libel." Israel already has authority from
Knesset to demand extradition from any nation of persons who "insult the
memory of the Jewish dead" by questioning the accuracy of the
six-million figure of Holocaust victims.
Hate laws, emerging
worldwide, have one real purpose-to criminalize that religion which
perpetually reminds and accuses Jews that their forefathers were guilty
of decide and that they share that guilt as long as they venerate those
who had Christ crucified, the Pharisees, authors of the tal_mud and
Zohar.
It
was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597
BC that
judaism's leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon
was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600
years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it.
As
an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man's religious
duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely
tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married a three
year old girl.
But with expulsion of the Jews in the 11th century
AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish
pedophilia abruptly ended.
Still, a shocking contradiction
lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral
guidance of the Pharisees and their tal_mud, they must accept the right
of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no
synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile
practice.
What exactly did these sages say?
The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine
years was not a “man” (See, "Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made
in Hell") Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not
lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev.
18:22) One passage in the tal_mud gives permission for a woman who
molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree
that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real
connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not. Because a
boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can't "throw guilt" on the active
offender, morally or legally.
A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even
being raised: "…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a
sexual act. The tal_mud also says, "A male aged nine years and a day who
cohabits with his deceased brother's wife acquires her (as wife).
Clearly, the tal_mud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have
sex with a nine year old
boy.
Sex at Three Years and One Day
In contrast to
Simeon ben Yohai's dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted
under the age of three years, the general teaching of the tal_mud is
that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could
be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape.
R. Joseph
said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired
in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits
with her, she becomes his. (Sanh. 55b)
A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation. . . .(Yeb. 57b)
A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by
coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she
becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)
It
was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A
proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted
to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have
not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas
(who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them. (Yeb. 60b)
[The tal_mud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit
for cohabitation. . . But all women children, that have not known man by
lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who
is fit for cohabitation. (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)
The example of
Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is
considered by the tal_mud as proof that such infants are "fit for
cohabitation."
The tal_mud teaches that an adult woman’s
molestation of a nine year old boy is "not a sexual act" and cannot
"throw guilt" upon her because the little boy is not truly a "man. But
they use opposite logic to
sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such
infants they count as “women," sexually mature and fully responsible to
comply with the requirements of marriage.
The tal_mud footnotes 3
and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy
and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. "At nine years a
male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is
reached at the age of three."
No Rights for Child Victims
The
Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children.
To complicate redress, the tal_mud says a rape victim must wait until
she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She
must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she
must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of
age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot
protest any more.”
The
tal_mud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the
possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and
spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen - an unthinkable
blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great
consequence, for, "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little
girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and
a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye." The footnote says
that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come
back to the little girl under three years.”
In most cases, the
tal_mud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia.
Defenders of the tal_mud claim this proves the tal_mud's amazing moral
advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts
favorably with "primitive" societies where the child would have been
stoned along with the adult perpetrator.
Actually,
the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence
of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly,
the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to "throw guilt"
on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By
thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the
tal_mud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.
on: the raping rabbi.
Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism. This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose
inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an
inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the
age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live
with a priest.
The footnote says that she was “married to a
priest”
and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus
upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A
proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted
to marry a priest.”
These child brides were expected to submit
willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a
little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on
her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”
In Sanhedrin 76b a
blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they
reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits
longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time
she is 12-1/2, the tal_mud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost
article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) - a deed for which “the Lord will not
spare him.” This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s
children whilst
minors.”
The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of
girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of
pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second
century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.
A Fascination with Sex
Perusing
the tal_mud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with
sex, especially by the most eminent ""rabbit ribeye"" rabbis. Dozens of
illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the
Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
The
rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached.
Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored
by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights
the world has ever known. A member of the earliest "Tannaim," rabbis
most influential in creating the tal_mud, he carries more authority to
observant Jews than Moses.
Today, the tal_mud’s outspoken
pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in
prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish
scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says
about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:
There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against the
Pharisees, who represented the finest traditions of their people and of
human morals.
Aren’t Christ’s words more appropriate?
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also
outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy
and iniquity. (Matthew 23:27, 28.)
Mortal Combat
Devout Jews have real reason to seek to outlaw Christianity as a form of
idol-worship. Why? Because Christianity does threaten Judaism. It is
fundamentally subversive and threatening to Jewish power and religious
authority. It undermines the whole concept of "chosenness" or salvation
through belonging to a particular race. That's part of why Christianity
has been persecuted and resented by Jewish leaders since the beginning
of the church age. That's what makes the unholy alliance between
evangelicals and Israel such a strange state of affairs.
Oh, btw, judaism is not a race, nor are chews, but their all a religion unto death and hell.
The Book of Acts describes how different from Judaism was the early
Christian church. It relates how the Holy Spirit's first infilling
caused a group of Christians to speak in the languages of their
listeners-Africans, Arabs, Jews and Romans alike. In explanation, Peter
quoted the prophet Joel: "In the last days, God says, I will pour out my
Spirit on all people And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord
will be saved."
Peter then preached an eloquent overview of the life and crucifixion of
Christ, Who was raised from the dead for the salvation of every person
Jew and Gentile-who would repent and trustfully obey Christ for life.
When his listeners asked what they should do, Peter replied, "Repent and
be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy
Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far
off-for all whom the
Lord our God will call."
"It is our duty to
force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they
will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6,
2004)
The Seven Noachide laws are general
commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such
a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart
from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the
sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of
criminals (see the Rambam's Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital
punishment in Torah are: S’kilah - Stoning; S’rifah - Burning; Hereg -
Decapitation; Henek - Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure
essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of
the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even
on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning
from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a,
b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).
tal_mud Dehumanizes Arabs
socialprofiles.zenfs.com/images/42a3ebad52d380e70e44b041b38ef39e_48.png
Humanity
is shocked by how the Israeli military criminalizes Arab youth, often
shooting them down as if they were subhuman. Yet this is exactly how the
tal_mud teaches Jews to regard Gentile children. “The tal_mud outlawed
the issue [or children] of a Gentile as that of a beast.”
During
the intifada uprising in Gaza in 1988, the world was horrified when
Israeli soldiers buried alive four Palestinian youths. Yet the tal_mud
sanctions Jewish
murder of Gentiles. The tal_mud says “if a Jew throws his neighbor
into a pit that contains a ladder, then hastens to remove the ladder,
he is not liable for the death of his neighbor. The Jew is also
permitted to roll a large stone over the pit opening, guaranteeing the
victim will not survive.
According to the tal_mud, “those who
deny the Torah and the prophets of Israel, the law is that they should
be killed and those who have the power of life and death should have
them killed, and if this cannot be done, they should be led to their
death by deceptive methods.”
but yet the chews kill all of
God's Prophets He sent unto them, and of course killed the Lamb of God
so that they may be saved.
The ta_mud’s homicidal hatred of
Gentiles leaps from its pages. The Jewish Encyclopedia quotes one of the
tal_mud’s most respectable rabbis, Simeon ben-Yohai: “The best among
the Gentiles deserves to be killed.”
So Folks you have wondered why i continue, "it's the Truth" that's
why i continue. God bless you all, and may your eyes be opened, and may your ears be able to hear. No.To_Noahide_ Laws.
By the time of Christ, Judaism was based on the “Oral Law.” The New Testament speaks of this as the “traditions of the elders.”
Jesus
Christ denounced and condemned the “traditions of the elders” in the
Gospel of John Chapter 5 and in the Gospel of Mark Chapter 7.
After
the Jewish leadership crucified Jesus Christ, and their subsequent
killings and persecution of Christians throughout the Roman world, the
rabbis committed to writing the “traditions of the elders” which formed
the first part of the tal_mud called the Mishnah.
This occurred
in Babylon toward the end of the second century A.D. All subsequent
books of the tal_mud were composed in Babylon from the third century
until the end of the sixth century A.D.
Br Nathanael: Is then Judaism based on the tal_mud and
not on the Bible?
Michael Hoffman: The hermeneutic system of
Judaism is not based on the Bible but on the tal_mud. This must be
understood when dealing with the rabbis and their submissive flock.
Judaism, though much in vogue with Evangelicals and Roman Catholics, is
totally alien to the only Biblical religion on earth today,
Christianity.
Br Nathanael: You said above that Jesus Christ denounced the traditions of the elders? How so?
Michael
Hoffman: The rabbis teach that the revelation granted to Moses had been
delivered in two forms, a smaller revelation in writing, and the larger
one kept oral.
The rabbis claim that the so-called “oral
revelation” had been transmitted by the leaders of each generation to
their successors—by Moses to Joshua; and then to the elders; to the
prophets; to the men of the Sanhedrin; to the leaders of the Pharisees;
and finally to the earliest rabbis who saw themselves as heirs of the
Pharisees.
This supposed transmission of the Oral Law, the
“tradition of the elders,” was challenged by >>>> Jesus who
termed it “commandments of men which nullify the Word of
God.”<<<<<
Thus Jesus made the tale of the
transmission a fraud. It is a lie concocted in hell to claim that Moses
issued two sets of law, one written and public - the other oral and
secret. In the entire Bible there is nothing to support this imposture.
Br Nathanael: So the oral tradition of the Jews is not consonant with the Old Testament?
Michael Hoffman: Not at all. The spurious claim of an oral “tradition of
the elders” bequeathed by God to Moses is anti-Biblical, just as Jesus
asserted.
Christ very simply illuminated the fact that if the Pharisaic tradition
had indeed been from Moses, then they would have become Christians. For
Christ rebuked them saying, “Had ye believed Moses, ye would have
believed Me, for he wrote of Me. But if ye believe not his writings, how
shall ye believe My words?”
Here Jesus annihilated in one stroke the basis for the religion of
Judaism and its conceit of an oral tradition given to it by Moses. For
had such a tradition existed it would have testified of Jesus the
Messiah. Instead, Christ tells them point blank that they do not follow
Moses!
Br Nathanael: When speaking of the centrality of the tal_mud in Judaism,
you refer to the “rabbis and their submissive flock.” How then does the
Jewish secularist figure into this submissive flock?
Michael Hoffman: All of those within the polity of Judaism, even the
Jewish secularist, give tacit allegiance to the rabbis. How often have
we heard from any of them when challenged with the Messiahship of Jesus,
this response: But the rabbis do not believe in Jesus!
Well of course they do not believe! How could they? For as Jesus stated
in his reproof to the Pharisees, their tradition is a denial of what
Moses wrote about the coming of the Messiah in the Person of Jesus
Christ. Moreover, as regards the Jewish secularist, he exhibits the same
chauvinism and racism as the Talmudists.
Br Nathanael: With the tal_mud being the basis of Judaism, how then does
one bring the Gospel message to the rabbis and their followers?
Michael Hoffman: When presenting Old Testament proofs of the Messiahship
of Jesus to the rabbis and their followers - one must penetrate the
iron-clad grid of the Talmudic mind-set which according to Christ’s
assertion makes the Scriptures of none effect.
From the outset, the Christian must realize that the rabbis and their
followers do not know their own Scriptures, and for that matter, do not
care to know them. For they view the Talmud as superceding the
Scriptures. Much patience is required when bringing the Gospel message
to them, and perhaps at times, stern reproofs are necessary.
America Lurches Toward Full-Blown Tyranny
By Stephen Lendman
12-3-11
Post-9/11, America's moved steadily toward eroding democracy entirely.
Justification given is war on terror hokum. Incrementally,
international, constitutional and statute laws have been trashed.
Equity, justice and other democratic values long ago were abandoned to
advance America's imperium. On May 26, the House voted to abolish
freedom entirely - HR 1540, 322 - 96.
On December 1, the Senate did likewise - S. 1867, 93 to 7. Both versions
assure no one anywhere is now safe, including law-abiding US citizens.
Senate no votes were cast by Thomas Harkin (D. IA), Rand Paul (R. KY),
Thomas Coburn (R. OK), Jeff Merkley (D. OR), Ron Wyden (D. OR), Mike Lee
(R. UT), and Bernie Sanders (I. VT).
Of the Senate's 51 Democrats, only one voted no.
At issue are Sections 1031 and 1032 of the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act - NDAA (S. 1867).
Section 1031 authorizes indefinitely detaining US citizens without
charge or trial. It exceeds previous police state laws. The provision
refers to US citizens or lawful resident aliens even though the
Constitution protects them. No longer.
Enactment means anyone anywhere, including US citizens, may be
indefinitely held without charge or trial, based solely on suspicions,
baseless allegations or none at all.
No reasonable proof is required, just suspicions that those detained
pose threats. Under subsection (b)(1), indefinite detentions can follow
mere membership (past or present) or support for suspect organizations.
Presidents would have unchecked authority to arrest, interrogate and
indefinitely detain law-abiding citizens if accused of potentially
posing a threat.
Constitutional, statute and international laws won't apply. Martial law will replace them.
Like the companion House bill (HR 1540), detention would be authorized based on alleged prior associations with suspect groups.
US military personnel anywhere in the world would be authorized to seize US citizens and others.
Section 1032 requires suspects held in military custody, outside
constitutionally mandated civil protections, including habeas rights,
due process, and other judicial procedures.
Presidents could order anyone arrested and imprisoned for life without charge or trial.
Abuse of power would replace rule of law protections.
Today, no evangelical leader has the privilege of removing guilt from
Jews who still reject their Messiah and embrace the teaching of His
murderers. Christ has both a long-standing love-affair and quarrel with
the Jewish nation. He will settle that quarrel some day on His own
terms, at last obtaining faith, obedience, and righteousness from what
scripture repeadedly describes as a "stiff-necked people."
Such a people now control Hollywood and America's media. They dominate
Congress. They dictate America's foreign policy in the Middle East. They
are the fountainhead of anti-Christian activity and legislation,
including so-called "anti-hate" laws which strip Christians of free
speech. (See articles on "anti-hate" laws.) In short, they are more
determined than ever that Christ will never prevail. Yet in the end,
Christ will have righteousness from His people, the Jews. "They will
look on Him whom they pierced and they will mourn ... as one mourns for
an only son." Zech. 12:10.
During the past century, Jewish apologists, for purposes of ecumenical harmony with Christians, have referred to Jesus in
such terms as "a great teacher." Such a description is found nowhere in
rabbinic Judaism's most sacred repository of authority, the Babylonian
tal_mud. Rabbinic Judaism, despite efforts to whitewash it, remains of
all great religions (including Islam) the most vehemently opposed to the
claims of Christ. To be a religious, observant Jew is to embrace the
tal_mud and its blasphemous opinion of Christ.
Someday, the Bible teaches, a remnant of Jews out of the Great
Tribulation will believe on the One their fathers crucified. Yet for the
present, the church must heed Christ's warning to "Beware of the leaven
(teaching) of the Pharisees." Matt. 16:6. In other words: Beware of
Judaism. Paul also warns the church, referring to unbelieving Jews as
"enemies" (Rom. 11:28) "...who both killed the Lord Jesus and prophets,
and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men."
I Thess. 2:15
The Jews were given transcendent spiritual light, first at Sinai, and
then through their prophets. When they rejected that light, they were
plunged into incredible darkness. While individual Jews may not
necessarily be held guilty of such apostasy, the fact is Jewish
leadership and institutions remain formidably opposed to Christianity.
Moses warned the Jews that if they rejected God's law, they would be
cursed above all nations. Deut. 28:15. They not only rejected God's law,
but crucified its giver, Jesus Christ. Christ said that the House of
Israel, after its rejection of Him, would be left desolate. Lk.13:35.
![]()
"THE
JEWISH UTOPIA", discovered by the author in an unlisted Jewish
collection in the library of the University of Texas, is the authentic
and complete plan of the Zionists for world domination. It pictures the
ultimate "new social order" which the Zionists hope to establish after
they have used Communism, democracy and a third world war to gain their
ends.
THE ULTIMATE WORLD ORDER is an analysis of "The Jewish Utopia", with photographs and excerpts from the original text.
Why
and in what way temporary? What did this far-sighted master strategist
of revolution see as the successor to Communism? Is it
not
disturbing enough that a machine dedicated to liquidating all opponents,
wiping out the nations as such and the best blood of the races and
blending the remnants into a faceless brown slob (see picture from a
UNESCO book elsewhere herein) — is it not disturbing enough that this
the Communist machine already enslaves nearly half the people
of the
world and is armed with hydrogen bombs?
*The Heine prophecy of
the destruction of Russia nearly a hundred years before the event is so
revealing and so amazing as to justify quoting at some length. Note the
picture of a nationless, raceless world, "one flock and one shepherd . .
. with an iron staff":
"Communism, though little discussed now
and loitering in hidden garrets on miserable straw pallets, is the dark
hero destined for a great, if temporary, role in the modern tragedy ....
"It
would be war, the ghastliest war of destruction . . . The second act is
the European and the World Revolution, the great duel between the
destitute and the aristocracy of wealth; and in that there will be no
mention of either nationality or religion; there will be only one
fatherland, the globe, and only one faith, that in happiness on earth . .
.
How could the drama end? "I do not know; but I think that eventually
the great sea serpent (Britain) will have its head crushed and the skin
of the Northern Bear (Russia) will be pulled over its ears. There may be
only one flock and one shepherd — one free shepherd with an iron staff,
and a shorn-alike, bleating-alike human herd! . . .
"... The Gods are veiling their faces in pity on the children of man,
their long-time charges, and perhaps over their own fate. The future
smells of Russian leather, blood, godlessness and many whippings. I
should advise our grandchildren to be born with very thick skins on
their backs." 1
If Communism is only temporary, what is to be the ultimate novus ordo
seclorum, the new order, of society if the successors to the Jewish
revolutionaries, Marx and Heine, accomplish their aim? Who are to be the
masters of the new order and what do they want to do with our children
and grandchildren?
It goes without saying that no man can escape concern about such a scheme if it has powerful backing.
For years I have felt that somewhere there must be a master plan
showing what Heine and his fellow planners had in mind for us, after the
fires of Communism burn away the heritages of the various races and
cultures, religions and nations; after Communist monsters have killed
out several generations of what they rightfully call "the leadership
personnel", all who might have the intelligence, skill and courage to
resist.
But I little expected ever to have this ultimate master plan, this
chapter beyond the Communist Manifesto, in my hands. Of the hundreds of
documents I have collected on activities of the Marxist revolutionaries —
including originals or photostats of official government reports,
Intelligence releases, Communist papers, Zionist organizational reports
to their members, Jewish histories of revolutions, biographies of their
revolutionary leaders, etc. — I have never seen anything comparable; for
this small book sketches the general outlines of the ultimate goal
hundreds of years ahead, toward which all the various activities of the
Zionists and their "liberal" dupes are, wittingly or unwittingly,
contributing.
ZIONISM FROM TALMUD AND TORAH
Yet, the book was not marked secret; it was in plain English and in
the Library of the University of Texas. (And a friend has found a copy
in the Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., supposedly a copy which
was filed with application for copyright in 1932.)
It is a book of 118 pages, plus preface, notes and bibliography,
entitled The Jewish Utopia (not A Jewish Utopia, but THE Jewish Utopia),
by Michael Higger, a university professor, published by the Lord
Baltimore Press, Baltimore, Md., 1932, and copyrighted the same year by
the author. If the book is not marked secret, if it is in plain English,
it is nevertheless almost safe, for it is largely couched in the
esoteric language which all Jewish revolutionaries have used throughout
known history, language found even in their Torah, (the Books of Moses)
and which Jewish writers imparted to Communist literature. Their use of
words which you and I take to mean one thing but which their followers
understand as meaning something else, a system which our people little
suspect, almost guarantees the security of the document.
Here at last is the complete plan of the Zionists, in their own words, for world domination.
What does the tal_mud teach about Jesus? It says He seduced and deceived the people. Git.56b-57a. He was a bastard, his
mother Mary being a whore San.106b. He practiced sorcery and enticed His
race to apostasy. San.43a. He was a fool. San.67a. He was stoned,
burned, decapitated and strangled in His death. San. 106b, Git.57a. He
was excommunicated for the thought of seducing a woman and in His shame
fell down and worshipped a brick. San.107b. He is now in hell,
languishing in boiling hot excrement. Git.56a. The tal_mud is emphatic
that it was necessary to kill Jesus because He was "one of the three
worst enemies of Judaism." Git.56a; a false prophet who seduced and
deceived the people. Git.56b-57a.
Is the modern Jew guilty of the death of Christ? The answer is simple.
If he agrees with the tal_mud that the Pharisees did the right thing by
having Jesus crucified, then that Jew today is as guilty as the Jewish
mob that sided with the Pharisees 2,000 years ago, shouting "Crucify
Him, crucify Him." Mk. 15:13. If, however, the modern Jew disassociates
himself from loyalty to the Pharisees and their claims against Christ,
then he is free from any guilt.
Unfortunately, amid the shock waves of Mel Gibson's "Passion," many
evangelical Christian leaders are rushing forward to absolve all Jews of
any spiritual guilt concerning the crucifixion. Such pandering not only
makes God's law of none effect, it attempts to free the Jews from a
burden of guilt they themselves invited. To hasten the crucifixion of
Christ, the Jewish leaders said, "His blood be upon us and upon our
children." Mk. 27:25. All adult Jews who still support the pharisaic
system which crucified Christ are thus linked in spiritual guilt with
those who actively accomplished the act.
Of course, anyone, such as a gentile Satanist, who approves of the
crucifixion, or a Christian who becomes apostate (Heb. 6:6), is
spiritually guilty of crucifying Christ. Rabbinic Judaism however,
because it constitutes the "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9) uniquely
incurs blame for Christ's death upon all Jews who give themselves to it.
more of the same TREASON
While the bill appears on the surface to be about authorizing defense funding
for the illegal wars, the ongoing unwarranted
surveillance of the US population and the continuing violations of the
4th Amendment as applied to US citizens, many of the provisions of
the bill do not pertain to unidentifiable terrorists or any other villain
carefully crafted to terrorize the country. The fact is, as a result
of the false flag attacks on 9/11, we have massive
numbers of police state “laws” on the books which created “terrorists” or
redefined “terrorist activity” to include everything from political dissent and
free speech, even including targeting of US citizens for mentioning or
referencing the Constitution or supporting third party, non-approved candidates
for public office.
When this bill passes with these police state provisions included (I believe
it will) you can expect your senator who voted “yes” on the bill to maintain
that they only did so because otherwise the funding for the wars would have
ceased (we could only hope) and they have to continue to fight the terrorists,
terrorism, or what ever lame excuse pops into their heads to explain why they
voted to pass what is clearly a police state bill.
Noahide enforcement
Noahide enforcement
"It is our duty to force all
mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not— they will be
killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October
6
The bill itself was drafted in secret and I believe it would be to
our benefit to know who actually drafted that bill.
You can bet the choose drafted their anti-Christ
treasonous bill, in order to protect them and their finance
institutions
Who were the “stakeholders” who actually wrote the bill introduced by these
two traitorous senators. We know they didn’t write it, they never do. All
bills are written by stakeholders who blow through the doors of congress carry
bags of cash to buy the support of politicians who make their living selling off
our rights along with anything else that isn’t nailed down.
1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison
without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up
inside and outside theUnited States;
(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be
outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the
United States itself; and
(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative,
law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by
the Department of Justice.
The
Washington
Post of course did its part to make sure it appeared this bill was about
“terrorists”, who could be held indefinitely, who could be subject to
extraordinary rendition (transferred to countries like Egypt for extensive
torture) and glossed over or totally avoided mentioning the fact that the
provisions of this bill could be applied, and are actually intended to be
applied to US citizens on US soil.
The language of the bill is intentionally very broadly written to allow later
interpretations that will be used to redefine yet again, our rights, our
protections, striking each one down under the false flag use of “the war of
terror”.
In the last several years we have seen the militarization of our local law enforcement under the direction of
Homeland Security. (which was created by the
choose) We now have major US cities
armed with military tanks, drones, and outfitted like star wars storm troopers;
all for use against US citizens in their own communities. Local law enforcement
has been remade into extended military units to enable them to become a working
military unit in tandem with military control. These law enforcement units have
ceased operating as “protect and serve” civil service operations and instead
have become direct threats to the communities which are forced to endure
them.
Only anti-Christ Murderous thugs are the nations cops
now
1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison
without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up
inside and outside theUnited States;
(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be
outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the
United States itself; and
(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative,
law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by
the Department of Justice.
The
Washington
Post of course did its part to make sure it appeared this bill was about
“terrorists”, who could be held indefinitely, who could be subject to
extraordinary rendition (transferred to countries like Egypt for extensive
torture) and glossed over or totally avoided mentioning the fact that the
provisions of this bill could be applied, and are actually intended to be
applied to US citizens on US soil.
In the last several years we have seen the militarization of our
local law enforcement under the direction of Homeland Security. (which
was created by the choose) We now have major US cities armed with
military tanks, drones, and outfitted like star wars storm troopers; all
for use against US citizens in their own communities. Local law
enforcement has been remade into extended military units to enable them
to become a working military unit in tandem with military control.
These law enforcement units have ceased operating as “protect and serve”
civil service operations and instead have become direct threats to the
communities which are forced to endure them.
Only anti-Christ Murderous thugs are the nations cops now
The escalating violence against the citizens, the abrogation of
rights, the violation of standing laws and the protection provided to
these units by the courts should have us all demanding an end to
Homeland Security interference in local law enforcement activities and
reverting law enforcement back to one of community protection and
service.
We have seen the creation of the White House Rural Council along with
other newly created agencies that all include the military as part of
their structure. This is no accident. There is no plausible reason the
military would be included in any Council making preparations to
unlawfully enter into the states, unless military action against the
citizenry was anticipated.
anti-Christ Noahide Enforcement soon
S.1867 is a catch all bill. Its intention is to make legal (not lawful)
the crime of unlawful detention without due process. By extension, the
bill would condone the practice of extraordinary rendition for the
purpose of torture of US citizens who could be kidnapped from our
streets without being charged with a crime, having access to the courts
for redress (the bill condones the military holding tribunals outside of
the US court system at its discretion) and holding US citizens
indefinitely without charging them with any crime.
someone better hide Crawford Texas, the Swiss are coming
This bill is one of the final steps necessary in striking down any
remaining Constitutional protections or rights, all under the phony war
of terror being perpetrated by our own government against its own
citizens. This is not a right or left, Democrat or Republican
plan……they are all in it together. They will all vote for it together
knowing full well that it is an assault on the people of the US.
In my opinion, it is an open declaration of war against the people by our own government.
This brings us back to the initial question:
If ordered to do so, would our own military turn on us?
It appears they would.
Noahide enforcement
"It is our duty to force all
mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not— they will be
killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October
6
The tal_mud teaches that a Jew may *kill, **steal, and ***lie to
non-Jews
with impunity -yet all of these actions are in violation of the 6th,
7th, and 9th commandments of Moses. Here is but one example of the Oral
Law making the Word of God “of none effect.” [*Tractates Sanhedrin 58b;
**Baba Mezia 24a; **Sanhedrin 57a; ***Baba Kama 113a]
There is
also the tal_mudic nullification of the sin of King David, by which sin,
Christians have learned to shun the sins of adultery and hostility,
reciting the penitent
words of King David in Psalm 51. But the religion of Judaism will have
none of this! For the tal_mud states: “whosoever says King David sinned
is mistaken.”
According to the T_al_mud the practice in those
days for men going to war was to give their wives conditional divorces.
The tal_mud states that Bathsheba was no longer married and hence
decrees that King David did not sin.
What the rabbis are actually
saying is that it is God who is mistaken–yet the Word of God clearly
declares that David sinned by killing Uriah the Hittite and committing
adultery with his wife: “Now therefore the sword shall never depart from
thine house because thou hast despised Me and hast taken the wife of
Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife.” (II Samuel 12)
Folks you have to realizes that your biggest enemy will be the sayers,
the sayers that say they are of Christ's seed, but they lie. they lie
with all their religious swaying back-n-forth with they dead religion of
the covenant with death and hell as their master race help them have
the great falling away. then their wanna-be g-d will be revealed as the
new and improved christ of the dead, and they will fall. as they sway
back and forth now, it's easy to see how, why and who. as their seed was
thrown on rocky soil, they die. they'll die the second death, and now
that's final, the death of the spirit. you see, it's appointed for all
men to die once. yes, once in the flesh, but you can still have
everlasting life to the only begotten Son, Christ Jesus, and no wanna-be
sayer.
The tal_mudic Choose and their remake of Sofiet Mass Murder here on "Marakan" apostate soil, you were warned to root these
Vipers out, but you refused
These Hasidic tal_muidic so called "Chosen Vipers" have set up their Der
Homelandt Saykurity by their Purim Mordechain Chertoff the Son of
Satan, soon and very soon they will begin the purging of the True Christ
believers who will stand fast for their testimony of Jesus and their
witness against the so called god of tal_mudic Jewry and their
manufactured by the dragon, anti-Christ Noahide Laws, and their
Proselyte Telly Tubby tal_mudic Judeo Churchinsanity will help them
deliver Jesus's saints to death. These Hasidic pedophile Vipers, the
Pharisees of Sanhedrin and their puppets in Washington blatantly
overthrow America while you all sleep.....in ah ha the name ah ha
Judeo-Jaysoose...... But rejoice, for these Vipers are defeated at the
foundation of the World and sealed at Calvary, and the saints of Jesus
shall have everlasting life.
the only way to get to be president of the United States of
It's-Really-Hell, is to get approval from the master race in
It's-Really_hell. haven't anyone noticed how everyone who want the high
offices here, they have to go to that state nation first. and if they
don't they won't. that's how simple it is. does everyone remember back
in 2000 that many of the demon-can't just all of a sudden found out they
were Jewish? remember Wesley Clark, Madeleine Albright, Hillary Rodham
Clinton, Paul Wellstone, heck there were a few others that said that
they didn'tknow they were jewish until... wait for it... now, well in
2000. heck everybody else knew they were. just something funny i
remember, duh.
The NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK is a pre-eminent source of information and
discussion concerning Jewish guilt. The previous article by NPN's
director, Rev. Ted Pike, addressed the question: "Are the Jews still
guilty for the crucifixion of Christ?"
The question of whether the Jews were guilty for the crucifixion 2,000
years ago is not the primary concern of this article. It has been
answered repeatedly and powerfully in the affirmative by both the New
Testament and Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ." Nor is the
popular cliché that we "all" killed Christ considered. The idea of
"corporate guilt" for Christ's death is unknown to Scripture. While we
"all have sinned and come short of the glory of God" (Rom. 3:23), we
have not all crucified Jesus.
Instead, Pike discusses the crucifixion as a specific act of blasphemy
and violence effected through a conspiracy of pharisaic leaders of the
first century A.D. It was secondarily accomplished with the assistance
of an agitated Jewish mob pressuring Pontius Pilate. It was only
incidentally completed by a handful of unwitting Roman soldiers.
In his article, Pike confirms what the New Testament attests: that the
Pharisees were the masterminds behind the crucifixion. In the Book of
Acts, the disciples, in face to face rebuke of the Pharisees,
insistently identify them as the culprits: "The God of our fathers
raised up Jesus, whom you had put to death by hanging Him on the cross."
Acts 5:30; cf. Acts 2:22, 36; 3:13-15; 4:10. The fact that modern
religious Jews give first loyalty to these ancient Pharisees and their
Talmud is crucially relevant to the question: Are Jews today guilty for
the crucifixion?
NPN's educational materials also deal with other aspects of the question of Jewish guilt. Are Jews guilty of:
creating the scourge of international communism?
dominating Hollywood and the media, corrupting humanity?
stimulating Mideast strife and terrorism through a century of abrasiveness against the Palestinians?
creating anti-Christian "civil liberties" organizations such as the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, which militate against Christian
values and symbols?
promoting anti-Christian legislation such as "hate crime laws" which protect Jews and homosexuals, but persecute Christians?